Of course it is infuriating to write a post with this title, just like I did for Parkland, and of course Las Vegas, and could have written many more (see: Buffalo just this month). I want to copy what I wrote in the third post for Parkland here, in part so I can not blow a gasket just thinking about this myself…why is it fathomable I can write the exact same words as nothing has happened in four years to make any sort of difference. The last two examples are particularly interesting and I could certainly update them in a subsequent post given the realities of what happened in Uvalde and Buffalo, and the hopefully obvious ridiculousness of the “good guys with guns” idea of protection.
Regardless, the families, citizens of Uvalde and the entire area are in my heart today and every day. If it helps any of you, know that so many of us are #UvaldeStrong
(from February 2018)
Below are some personal observations and opinions about the arguments I see when many of us try to say we should think about restrictions on guns. I think my observations are reasonable but understand it’s quite a debated point. The frame of reference is that I have never been a big fan of guns, though I have shot guns before, and actually have enjoyed skeet shooting, for example. I certainly acknowledge that I could learn more about others’ views who feel more affinity towards guns. To be very specific, my biggest beef has always been with assault rifles, I just can’t understand why we need access to those.
“If someone wants to do harm they will find a way.” Sure thing, but let’s try to limit the damage wherever possible, right? Give ourselves a fighting chance against the weaponry they bring. And on the margin, if it’s really, really difficult to obtain the weapon, we might see people deterred from committing the crime at all.
“There is nothing we can do to ensure 100% safety.” Understand that. But there are plenty of examples of us doing many things to try to get close to 100%. When a big fire happens, we update building codes and add sprinklers. When one guy tries to put a bomb in his shoe, the rest of us have to take our shoes off for eternity to get on a plane.
“It’s not about the guns it’s about the person and their mental health.” Mental health is extremely hard to detect, predict, etc. Someone can seem pretty sane, buy a bunch of guns, and then seemingly out of the blue go crazy. See: October 1.
“We’d be better off giving everyone else a gun so they can protect themselves.” Personally, no thanks, it is not 1860 anymore. Most people don’t know how to use guns, and the accidental deaths from guns (especially kids) don’t seem to fit the cost/benefit in my mind.
“What we need is to protect our schools, like have more armed guards.” Here’s the one that I feel I know most about. For years, we bolstered security at entertainment venues; no major arena now allows you in without subjecting you to a metal detector screen. But what happened? Bombs started going off outside the venue, just outside where the security screening happens. Or a long-range rifle is used so the shooter can be outside the perimeter. Sometimes we can’t get to the root cause, sometimes we can – in this case (again from a cost-benefit perspective), it seems it would be less costly and invasive to deal with access to guns than it would be to arm every place children might gather everywhere in the country.